Premium
Static stress triggering explains the empirical aftershock distance decay
Author(s) -
Hainzl Sebastian,
Moradpour Javad,
Davidsen Jörn
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1002/2014gl061975
Subject(s) - aftershock , induced seismicity , geology , scaling , coulomb , stress (linguistics) , seismology , fractal , range (aeronautics) , exponent , statistical physics , fractal dimension , physics , magnitude (astronomy) , fault (geology) , geometry , mathematics , astrophysics , mathematical analysis , electron , materials science , linguistics , philosophy , quantum mechanics , composite material
The shape of the spatial aftershock decay is sensitive to the triggering mechanism and thus particularly useful for discriminating between static and dynamic stress triggering. For California seismicity, it has been recently recognized that its form is more complicated than typically assumed consisting of three different regimes with transitions at the scale of the rupture length and the thickness of the crust. The intermediate distance range is characterized by a relative small decay exponent of 1.35 previously declared to relate to dynamic stress triggering. We perform comprehensive simulations of a simple clock‐advance model, in which the number of aftershocks is just proportional to the Coulomb‐stress change, to test whether the empirical result can be explained by static stress triggering. Similarly to the observations, the results show three scaling regimes. For simulations adapted to the depths and focal mechanisms observed in California, we find a remarkable agreement with the observation over the whole distance range for a fault distribution with fractal dimension of 1.8, which is shown to be in good agreement with an independent analysis of California seismicity.