z-logo
Premium
Predicting long‐term carbon sequestration in response to CO 2 enrichment: How and why do current ecosystem models differ?
Author(s) -
Walker Anthony P.,
Zaehle Sönke,
Medlyn Belinda E.,
De Kauwe Martin G.,
Asao Shinichi,
Hickler Thomas,
Parton William,
Ricciuto Daniel M.,
Wang YingPing,
Wårlind David,
Norby Richard J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1002/2014gb004995
Subject(s) - carbon sequestration , ecosystem , environmental science , sink (geography) , context (archaeology) , nitrogen , ecosystem model , atmospheric sciences , terrestrial ecosystem , soil science , ecology , chemistry , biology , geology , geography , paleontology , cartography , organic chemistry
Large uncertainty exists in model projections of the land carbon (C) sink response to increasing atmospheric CO 2 . Free‐Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments lasting a decade or more have investigated ecosystem responses to a step change in atmospheric CO 2 concentration. To interpret FACE results in the context of gradual increases in atmospheric CO 2 over decades to centuries, we used a suite of seven models to simulate the Duke and Oak Ridge FACE experiments extended for 300 years of CO 2 enrichment. We also determine key modeling assumptions that drive divergent projections of terrestrial C uptake and evaluate whether these assumptions can be constrained by experimental evidence. All models simulated increased terrestrial C pools resulting from CO 2 enrichment, though there was substantial variability in quasi‐equilibrium C sequestration and rates of change. In two of two models that assume that plant nitrogen (N) uptake is solely a function of soil N supply, the net primary production response to elevated CO 2 became progressively N limited. In four of five models that assume that N uptake is a function of both soil N supply and plant N demand, elevated CO 2 led to reduced ecosystem N losses and thus progressively relaxed nitrogen limitation. Many allocation assumptions resulted in increased wood allocation relative to leaves and roots which reduced the vegetation turnover rate and increased C sequestration. In addition, self‐thinning assumptions had a substantial impact on C sequestration in two models. Accurate representation of N process dynamics (in particular N uptake), allocation, and forest self‐thinning is key to minimizing uncertainty in projections of future C sequestration in response to elevated atmospheric CO 2 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom