z-logo
Premium
Photodissociation of water and O( 3 P J ) formation on a lunar impact melt breccia
Author(s) -
DeSimone Alice J.,
Orlando Thomas M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9100
pISSN - 2169-9097
DOI - 10.1002/2013je004598
Subject(s) - photodissociation , radical , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , oxygen , photochemistry , irradiation , ionization , ion , hydroxyl radical , mass spectrum , atomic physics , physics , organic chemistry , chromatography , nuclear physics
Abstract Photodissociation of water deposited on an impact melt breccia collected during Apollo 16 was studied by measuring O( 3 P J = 2,1,0 ) photoproducts detected with resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization. For each spin‐orbit state, the oxygen atom time‐of‐flight (TOF) spectrum was measured as a function of H 2 O exposure and 157 nm irradiation time. Four Maxwell‐Boltzmann distributions with translational temperatures of 10,000 K, 1800 K, 400 K, and 102 K were required to fit the data. The most likely formation mechanisms are molecular hydrogen elimination following ion‐electron recombination, secondary recombination of hydroxyl radicals, and photodissociation of adsorbed hydroxyls. The irradiation time required to reach maximum oxygen signal suggests that water clusters into islands when adsorbing on the lunar impact melt breccia. After enough irradiation for the oxygen atom yield to reach its maximum, the slowly decreasing signal was fit with an exponential curve to obtain a cross section that represents the rate of surface hydroxyl depletion. For 0.1, 1, and 5 Langmuir (1 L = 10 −6  Torr s) H 2 O exposure, respectively, the measured O( 3 P) depletion cross sections were 4.9 × 10 −20 , 6.6 × 10 −20 , and 4.6 × 10 −20  cm 2 . These results imply that photodissociation of water on the lunar surface cannot account for the large mass‐16 (±1 amu) signal observed in the lunar atmosphere. Unless another significant source of oxygen atoms is present, this unexpectedly large signal is likely due to CH 4 or OH.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here