Premium
Low‐altitude summer/winter microphysics, dynamics, and CCN spectra of northeastern Caribbean small cumuli, and comparisons with stratus
Author(s) -
Hudson James G.,
Noble Stephen
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2013jd021442
Subject(s) - cloud condensation nuclei , marine stratocumulus , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , altitude (triangle) , entrainment (biomusicology) , cloud height , cloud physics , liquid water content , meteorology , cloud top , climatology , cloud cover , physics , cloud computing , aerosol , mathematics , geology , satellite , geometry , astronomy , rhythm , acoustics , computer science , operating system
Low‐altitude cloud microphysics and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) spectra are presented and analyzed from two cumulus cloud aircraft field campaigns, Ice in Clouds Experiment‐Tropical (ICE‐T) and Rain in Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO), in the same eastern Caribbean location at opposite seasons. These are further compared with two previously analyzed stratus cloud aircraft campaigns off the central California coast, Physics of Stratocumulus Tops (POST) and Marine Stratus/Stratocumulus Experiment (MASE). Multiple regression analysis predictions of cloud droplet concentrations ( N c ) based on CCN spectra, N CCN ( S ) where S is supersaturation, compared much better with measured N c than single N CCN ‐ N c regressions in both cumulus projects. The addition of vertical velocity ( W ) to the single and multiple regressions showed small improvements. For RICO the multiple regression correlations were also superior to previous adiabatic model predictions of N c also based on N CCN ( S ) and mean W . More adiabatic cloud parcels with considerably higher N c , liquid water contents, and W showed only slightly better correlations than flight‐averaged N c of all low clouds. Results show the value of more extensive CCN spectra and the relative unimportance of W variations for determining N c , in these Caribbean cumuli. The fact that flight‐averaged N c of all low cloud data was almost as well correlated with N CCN ( S ) as were N c of more adiabatic cloud parcels indicates that entrainment did not significantly perturb CCN‐ N c relationships. As should be expected higher cloud S were determined for the cumulus clouds than for the stratus clouds. Suppression of cloud S by higher N CCN that had previously been observed in stratus was observed in ICE‐T but not in RICO where the N CCN range may have been too low for cloud S suppression. But ICE‐T and POST even showed this S suppression over the same limited N CCN range as RICO (< 200 cm −3 ).