z-logo
Premium
Physical properties of Arctic versus subarctic snow: Implications for high latitude passive microwave snow water equivalent retrievals
Author(s) -
Derksen C.,
Lemmetyinen J.,
Toose P.,
Silis A.,
Pulliainen J.,
Sturm M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2013jd021264
Subject(s) - snow , water equivalent , subarctic climate , arctic , environmental science , microwave , high latitude , latitude , atmospheric sciences , climatology , meteorology , geology , geography , oceanography , engineering , geodesy , telecommunications
Two unique observational data sets are used to evaluate the ability of multi‐layer snow emission models to simulate passive microwave brightness temperatures (T B ) in high latitude, observation sparse, snow‐covered environments. Data were utilized from a coordinated series of 18 sites measured across the subarctic Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada in April 2007 during a 1000 km segment of a 4200 km snowmobile traverse from Fairbanks, Alaska to Baker Lake, Nunavut (~64°N). In April 2011, a network of 22 high Arctic sites was sampled across a 60 × 60 km study area on the Fosheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Island (~80°N). In comparison to sites across the subarctic, high Arctic snow was more spatially variable, thinner (site averages between 15 and 25 cm versus 30 to 40 cm), colder (−25°C versus −10°C), composed of fewer layers, had a proportionally higher fraction of wind slabs (storing 57% of the snow water equivalent (SWE) versus 15%), with these slabs comparatively denser (often exceeding 450 g/cm 3 , compared to 350 g/cm 3 in the subarctic). The physical snow measurements were used as inputs to snow emission model simulations. The radiometric difference between simulations of “typical” arctic and subarctic snow reached 30 K at 37 GHz. Sensitivity analysis showed that this T B difference could be partitioned between the effects of physical temperature (~5 K between −25°C and −10°C), wind slab density (~5 K between 0.40and 0.35 g/cm 3 ), and vertical depth hoar fraction (~20 K between 70% and 30% vertical fraction of total snow depth). Model simulations at the satellite scale (625 km 2 ) were produced using the observational spread for snow depth and snow stratigraphy. The range of T B from simulations with varied stratigraphy extended unrealistically far below the magnitude of satellite measured T B , illustrating that the snow depth first guess is very important for SWE retrieval schemes that are based on forward emission model simulations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here