z-logo
Premium
The low‐level jet dust emission mechanism in the central Sahara: Observations from Bordj‐Badji Mokhtar during the June 2011 Fennec Intensive Observation Period
Author(s) -
Allen Christopher J. T.,
Washington Richard
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2013jd020594
Subject(s) - atmospheric sciences , wind shear , environmental science , wind speed , diurnal cycle , katabatic wind , meteorology , climatology , geology , physics
This paper presents the first detailed analysis of low‐level jets (LLJs) in the central Sahara from ground‐based observations at Bordj‐Badji Mokhtar, Algeria, and addresses their operation as a dust emission mechanism. On LLJ mornings, composite wind speeds in the core (300 m aboveground level) reach 13.5 m s −1 at 0400. Surface temperatures increase from 0545 (30 min after sunrise), and jet decay begins around 0600. Ten meter winds lag those in the core by 5 h; peak 10 m wind speed, 7.5 m s −1 , occurs at 0900. Only the deepest and strongest LLJs lead to dust emission. At 0600, these five LLJs have core wind speeds ≥16 m s −1 , below‐core wind shear ≥ 0.6 m s −1 /30 m, and wind shear between the core and 500 m above the core ≤−1.8 m s −1 . On these occasions, momentum mixes down from the LLJ after surface heating, leading to emission. On nondusty LLJ mornings, the convective boundary layer is 100 m shallower, and the LLJ is too weak to provide enough momentum to be mixed down for emission. LLJs are most frequently embedded in the monsoon flow or in the Harmattan; there is a clear association with the Saharan Heat Low. ERA‐Interim reanalysis underestimates both Harmattan and monsoon LLJ core winds (by 4 m s −1 and 6 m s −1 , respectively). The Met Office Africa Limited Area Model underestimates Harmattan LLJ core winds by only 0.2 m s −1 . Monsoon LLJ core winds, however, are underestimated by 8.5 m s −1 . Surface winds at 0900 are underestimated in both cases by up to 6 m s −1 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here