Premium
On using the relationship between Doppler velocity and radar reflectivity to identify microphysical processes in midlatitudinal ice clouds
Author(s) -
Kalesse Heike,
Kollias Pavlos,
Szyrmer Wanda
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2013jd020386
Subject(s) - radar , doppler effect , power law , ice cloud , reflectivity , doppler radar , meteorology , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , computational physics , remote sensing , physics , geology , optics , mathematics , statistics , radiative transfer , telecommunications , astronomy , computer science
Ground‐based 35 GHz profiling Doppler cloud radar observations of ice clouds were used to derive the power law relation between Doppler velocity V d and radar reflectivity Z ( V d = aZ b ). By removing the vertical air motion from V d , the power law can be rewritten as V t = aZ b with V t being the reflectivity‐weighted particle terminal fall velocity. Profiles of this relation are variable with height. An attempt was made to relate this variability to the dominant microphysical processes in different layers of the cloud. Based on that, the possibility of using profiles of the parameters a and b to distinguish different microphysical regimes was explored. The methodology was applied to long‐term measurements (January 1997 to December 2010) at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site in the Southern Great Plains. Principal component analysis was used to determine the modes of the profiles that explain most of the observed variance in the observations. Profile‐averaged means and standard deviations of parameters a and b amounted to 0.65 ± 0.42 and 0.03 ± 0.19, respectively. Furthermore, three commonly used microphysical relations related to bulk quantities were used to determine values of a and b . These results were found to compare reasonably well with the values obtained from the radar observations. Finally, microphysical considerations showed that radar‐derived values of parameter b can be explained in terms of particle size distribution moment changes.