Premium
Ionospheric model‐observation comparisons: E layer at Arecibo Incorporation of SDO‐EVE solar irradiances
Author(s) -
Sojka Jan J.,
Jensen Joseph B.,
David Michael,
Schunk Robert W.,
Woods Tom,
Eparvier Frank,
Sulzer Michael P.,
Gonzalez Sixto A.,
Eccles J. Vincent
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2013ja019528
Subject(s) - irradiance , ionosphere , altitude (triangle) , solar irradiance , physics , atmospheric sciences , incoherent scatter , remote sensing , extreme ultraviolet , meteorology , environmental science , optics , geology , astronomy , laser , geometry , mathematics
This study evaluates how the new irradiance observations from the NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) can, with its high spectral resolution and 10 s cadence, improve the modeling of the E region. To demonstrate this a campaign combining EVE observations with that of the NSF Arecibo incoherent scatter radar (ISR) was conducted. The ISR provides E region electron density observations with high‐altitude resolution, 300 m, and absolute densities using the plasma line technique. Two independent ionospheric models were used, the Utah State University Time‐Dependent Ionospheric Model (TDIM) and Space Environment Corporation's Data‐Driven D Region (DDDR) model. Each used the same EVE irradiance spectrum binned at 1 nm resolution from 0.1 to 106 nm. At the E region peak the modeled TDIM density is 20% lower and that of the DDDR is 6% higher than observed. These differences could correspond to a 36% lower (TDIM) and 12% higher (DDDR) production rate if the differences were entirely attributed to the solar irradiance source. The detailed profile shapes that included the E region altitude and that of the valley region were only qualitatively similar to observations. Differences on the order of a neutral‐scale height were present. Neither model captured a distinct dawn to dusk tilt in the E region peak altitude. A model sensitivity study demonstrated how future improved spectral resolution of the 0.1 to 7 nm irradiance could account for some of these model shortcomings although other relevant processes are also poorly modeled.