z-logo
Premium
REPAD: An empirical model of pitch angle distributions for energetic electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt
Author(s) -
Chen Yue,
Friedel Reiner H. W.,
Henderson Michael G.,
Claudepierre Seth G.,
Morley Steven K.,
Spence Harlan E.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2013ja019431
Subject(s) - pitch angle , van allen radiation belt , physics , equator , electron , computational physics , earth's magnetic field , magnetic dip , polar , flux (metallurgy) , tilt (camera) , line (geometry) , magnetic field , magnetosphere , geometry , geophysics , nuclear physics , mathematics , astronomy , materials science , quantum mechanics , metallurgy , latitude
We have recently conducted a statistical survey on pitch angle distributions of energetic electrons trapped in the Earth's outer radiation belt, and a new empirical model was developed based upon survey results. This model—relativistic electron pitch angle distribution (REPAD)—aims to present statistical pictures of electron equatorial pitch angle distributions, instead of the absolute flux levels, as a function of energy, L shell, magnetic local time, and magnetic activity. To quantify and facilitate this statistical survey, we use Legendre polynomials to fit long‐term in situ directional fluxes observed near the magnetic equator from three missions: CRRES, Polar, and LANL‐97A. As the first of this kind of model, REPAD covers the whole outer belt region, providing not only the mean and median pitch angle distributions in the area but also error estimates of the average distributions. Preliminary verification and validation results demonstrate the reliable performance of this model. Usage of REPAD is mainly to predict the full pitch angle distribution of fluxes along a given magnetic field line, or even on a given drift shell, based upon one single unidirectional or omnidirectional flux measurement anywhere on that field line. This can be particularly useful for data assimilation, which usually has large tolerance on data errors. In addition, relatively small variations in pitch angle distributions measured at L shell between ~ 4 and 5 justify the assumption of fixed pitch angle distributions at GPS equatorial crossings (L ~ 4.2) used in our previous studies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here