z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An interlaboratory study of TEX 86 and BIT analysis of sediments, extracts, and standard mixtures
Author(s) -
Schouten Stefan,
Hopmans Ellen C.,
RosellMelé Antoni,
Pearson Ann,
Adam Pierre,
Bauersachs Thorsten,
Bard Edouard,
Bernasconi Stefano M.,
Bianchi Thomas S.,
Brocks Jochen J.,
Carlson Laura Truxal,
Castañeda Isla S.,
Derenne Sylvie,
Selver Ayça Doğrul,
Dutta Koushik,
Eglinton Timothy,
Fosse Celine,
Galy Valier,
Grice Kliti,
Hinrichs KaiUwe,
Huang Yongsong,
Huguet Arnaud,
Huguet Carme,
Hurley Sarah,
Ingalls Anitra,
Jia Guodong,
Keely Brendan,
Knappy Chris,
Kondo Miyuki,
Krishnan Srinath,
Lincoln Sara,
Lipp Julius,
Mangelsdorf Kai,
MartínezGarcía Alfredo,
Ménot Guillemette,
Mets Anchelique,
Mollenhauer Gesine,
Ohkouchi Naohiko,
Ossebaar Jort,
Pagani Mark,
Pancost Richard D.,
Pearson Emma J.,
Peterse Francien,
Reichart GertJan,
Schaeffer Philippe,
Schmitt Gaby,
Schwark Lorenz,
Shah Sunita R.,
Smith Richard W.,
Smittenberg Rienk H.,
Summons Roger E.,
Takano Yoshinori,
Talbot Helen M.,
Taylor Kyle W. R.,
Tarozo Rafael,
Uchida Masao,
Dongen Bart E.,
Mooy Benjamin A. S.,
Wang Jinxiang,
Warren Courtney,
Weijers Johan W. H.,
Werne Josef P.,
Woltering Martijn,
Xie Shucheng,
Yamamoto Masanobu,
Yang Huan,
Zhang Chuanlun L.,
Zhang Yige,
Zhao Meixun,
Damsté Jaap S. Sinninghe
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1002/2013gc004904
Subject(s) - reproducibility , sediment , geology , round robin test , paleoceanography , mineralogy , soil science , analytical chemistry (journal) , oceanography , environmental chemistry , chemistry , chromatography , geomorphology , mathematics , statistics
Two commonly used proxies based on the distribution of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) are the TEX 86 (TetraEther indeX of 86 carbon atoms) paleothermometer for sea surface temperature reconstructions and the BIT (Branched Isoprenoid Tetraether) index for reconstructing soil organic matter input to the ocean. An initial round‐robin study of two sediment extracts, in which 15 laboratories participated, showed relatively consistent TEX 86 values (reproducibility ±3–4°C when translated to temperature) but a large spread in BIT measurements (reproducibility ±0.41 on a scale of 0–1). Here we report results of a second round‐robin study with 35 laboratories in which three sediments, one sediment extract, and two mixtures of pure, isolated GDGTs were analyzed. The results for TEX 86 and BIT index showed improvement compared to the previous round‐robin study. The reproducibility, indicating interlaboratory variation, of TEX 86 values ranged from 1.3 to 3.0°C when translated to temperature. These results are similar to those of other temperature proxies used in paleoceanography. Comparison of the results obtained from one of the three sediments showed that TEX 86 and BIT indices are not significantly affected by interlaboratory differences in sediment extraction techniques. BIT values of the sediments and extracts were at the extremes of the index with values close to 0 or 1, and showed good reproducibility (ranging from 0.013 to 0.042). However, the measured BIT values for the two GDGT mixtures, with known molar ratios of crenarchaeol and branched GDGTs, had intermediate BIT values and showed poor reproducibility and a large overestimation of the “true” (i.e., molar‐based) BIT index. The latter is likely due to, among other factors, the higher mass spectrometric response of branched GDGTs compared to crenarchaeol, which also varies among mass spectrometers. Correction for this different mass spectrometric response showed a considerable improvement in the reproducibility of BIT index measurements among laboratories, as well as a substantially improved estimation of molar‐based BIT values. This suggests that standard mixtures should be used in order to obtain consistent, and molar‐based, BIT values.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here