Premium
Beware of memes in the interpretation of your results – lessons from gene‐disrupted mice in fertilization research
Author(s) -
Okabe Masaru
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
febs letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.593
H-Index - 257
eISSN - 1873-3468
pISSN - 0014-5793
DOI - 10.1002/1873-3468.13101
Subject(s) - human fertilization , interpretation (philosophy) , reproducibility , gene , biology , relation (database) , computational biology , psychology , bioinformatics , genetics , epistemology , computer science , data mining , philosophy , programming language
For decades, researchers in the fertilization field reported various candidate factors involved in sperm–egg interaction through experiments using enzyme inhibitors and/or antibodies. However, almost all of these factors have been shown to be nonessential by gene disruption experiments. Recently, attention has focused on the low reproducibility of papers in many research fields. In this Review, I retrospectively revisit how fertilization factors were misinterpreted and led to wrong hypotheses in relation to the reportedly low reproducibility of scientific papers.