Premium
The use of tat and env sequences from human immunodeficiency virus 1 in phylogenetic epidemiological studies
Author(s) -
Lorenzo Eric,
Collins Timothy,
Fisher Eva,
Herrera Rene J.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/1522-2683(200102)22:3<438::aid-elps438>3.0.co;2-0
Subject(s) - phylogenetic tree , biology , molecular epidemiology , genetics , exon , epidemiology , gene , phylogenetics , virology , polymerase chain reaction , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , virus , genotype , medicine , pathology
Abstract Using nucleotide sequences from the first exon of the tat gene of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV‐1), we tested the hypothesis that a Florida dentist (a common source) infected five of his patients in the course of dental procedures against the null hypothesis that the dentist and each individual of the dental group independently acquired the virus within the local community. This novel approach of analyzing the tat gene region was used because it may, in some circumstances, be more informative for phylogenetic epidemiology than the more commonly used C2‐V3 envelope gene region. The first exon of the tat gene was polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐amplified and directly sequenced from uncultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Patient's sequences were compared with sequences from six HIV‐1 infected heterosexual couples unrelated to the dentist or the five patients, but from the same general geographic area. In addition, a sixth infected dental patient, previously inferred to have acquired HIV‐1 from a source other than the dentist, was included. Multiple phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that the sequences of the five patients were significantly more closely related to each other than to sequences of the controls. Our results using tat sequences, combined with envelope sequence data, strongly support a common phylogenetic epidemiological relationship among these five patients, and the HIV‐1 infected dentist who treated them. Correct recovery of known epidemiological relationships among couples included in the analysis further strengthens this conclusion.