Premium
The Interaction of Ground and Excited States of Lumichrome with Aliphatic and Aromatic Amines in Methanol
Author(s) -
Encinas María V.,
Bertolotti Sonia G.,
Previtali Carlos M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
helvetica chimica acta
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.74
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1522-2675
pISSN - 0018-019X
DOI - 10.1002/1522-2675(200205)85:5<1427::aid-hlca1427>3.0.co;2-a
Subject(s) - chemistry , methanol , excited state , photochemistry , organic chemistry , atomic physics , physics
The reaction of the ground and excited states of lumichrome (=7,8‐dimethylalloxazine=7,8‐dimethylbenzo[ g ]pteridine‐2,4(1 H ,3 H )‐dione) with aliphatic and aromatic amines was investigated in MeOH. In the presence of aliphatic amines of high basicity, new bands are observed in the absorption and fluorescence spectra. These bands arise in a proton‐transfer reaction from lumichrome, in the ground and in the singlet excited states, to the amine. On the other hand, amines with lower basicity such as triethanolamine (=2,2′,2″‐nitrilotris[ethanol]) and aromatic amines are not able to deprotonate lumichrome, and hence a quenching of the fluorescent emission takes place without changes in the spectral shape. In this case, bimolecular‐quenching rate constants were determined for the excited singlet and triplet states. Based on laser‐flash‐photolysis experiments, an electron‐transfer mechanism is proposed. Aliphatic amines yield lower rate constants than the aromatic ones for the same driving force. A notable difference arises in the limiting value reached by the singlet and triplet quenching rate constants by aromatic amines. For the singlet quenching, the limit is coincident with a diffusion‐controlled reaction, while those for triplet quenching reach a lower constant value, independent of the driving force. This is explained by an electron‐transfer mechanism, with a lower frequency factor for the triplet‐state process.