Premium
Electroanalytical Determination of Oxadiazon and Characterization of Its Base‐Catalyzed Ring‐Opening Products
Author(s) -
Garrido E. M.,
Lima J. L. F. C.,
DelerueMatos C.,
Borges M. F. M.,
Brett A. M. Oliveira
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
electroanalysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1521-4109
pISSN - 1040-0397
DOI - 10.1002/1521-4109(200103)13:3<199::aid-elan199>3.0.co;2-g
Subject(s) - detection limit , electroanalytical method , electrochemistry , chemistry , supporting electrolyte , hydrolysis , hydrazine (antidepressant) , adsorption , redox , aqueous solution , cyclic voltammetry , glassy carbon , titration , electrolyte , voltammetry , inorganic chemistry , nuclear chemistry , electrode , chromatography , organic chemistry , potentiometric titration
The electrochemical behavior of the hydrolysis products of oxadiazon was studied by cyclic and square‐wave voltammetry using a glassy carbon electrode. Maximum currents were obtained at pH 12.8 in an aqueous electrolyte solution containing 30 % ethanol and the current did not decrease with time showing that there was little adsorption of the reaction products on the electrode surface. The hydrolysis products of oxadiazon were identified, after isolation and purification, as 1‐trimethylacetyl‐2‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐isopropoxyphenyl)‐2‐ethoxycarbonylhydrazine (Oxa1) and 1‐trimethylacetyl‐2‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐isopropoxyphenyl) hydrazine (Oxa2) with redox potentials +0.6 V and −0.1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), respectively. Based on the electrochemical behavior of 1‐trimethylacetyl‐2‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐isopropoxyphenyl) hydrazine (Oxa2) a simple electroanalytical procedure was developed for the determination of oxadiazon in commercial products used in the treatment of rice crops in Portugal that contain oxadiazon as the active ingredient. The detection limit was 1×10 −4 M, the mean content and relative standard deviation obtained for seven samples of two different commercial products by the electrochemical method were 28.4±0.8 % (Ronstar) and 1.9±0.2 % (Ronstar GR), and the recoveries were 100.3±5.4 % and 101.1±5.3 %, respectively.