Premium
Analysis of Longitudinal Data of Epileptic Seizure Counts – A Two‐State Hidden Markov Regression Approach
Author(s) -
Wang Peiming,
Puterman Martin L.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
biometrical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.108
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1521-4036
pISSN - 0323-3847
DOI - 10.1002/1521-4036(200112)43:8<941::aid-bimj941>3.0.co;2-#
Subject(s) - statistics , regression analysis , regression , epilepsy , epileptic seizure , markov chain , longitudinal data , mathematics , econometrics , computer science , psychology , data mining , neuroscience
Abstract This paper discusses a two‐state hidden Markov Poisson regression (MPR) model for analyzing longitudinal data of epileptic seizure counts, which allows for the rate of the Poisson process to depend on covariates through an exponential link function and to change according to the states of a two‐state Markov chain with its transition probabilities associated with covariates through a logit link function. This paper also considers a two‐state hidden Markov negative binomial regression (MNBR) model, as an alternative, by using the negative binomial instead of Poisson distribution in the proposed MPR model when there exists extra‐Poisson variation conditional on the states of the Markov chain. The two proposed models in this paper relax the stationary requirement of the Markov chain, allow for overdispersion relative to the usual Poisson regression model and for correlation between repeated observations. The proposed methodology provides a plausible analysis for the longitudinal data of epileptic seizure counts, and the MNBR model fits the data much better than the MPR model. Maximum likelihood estimation using the EM and quasi‐Newton algorithms is discussed. A Monte Carlo study for the proposed MPR model investigates the reliability of the estimation method, the choice of probabilities for the initial states of the Markov chain, and some finite sample behaviors of the maximum likelihood estimates, suggesting that (1) the estimation method is accurate and reliable as long as the total number of observations is reasonably large, and (2) the choice of probabilities for the initial states of the Markov process has little impact on the parameter estimates.