Premium
Nipping the Cambrian “explosion” in the bud?
Author(s) -
Morris Simon Conway
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
bioessays
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.175
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1521-1878
pISSN - 0265-9247
DOI - 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1053::aid-bies2>3.0.co;2-2
Subject(s) - fossilization , paleontology , perspective (graphical) , biology , fossil record , phylum , morphology (biology) , biological evolution , evolutionary biology , history , epistemology , philosophy , computer science , artificial intelligence , linguistics , genetics , bacteria
In recent years, two schools of thought have emerged with regard to the Cambrian “explosion”. One argues that it was very quick, with phyla tumbling into existence in a virtual geological instant. The other view has a more relaxed temporal perspective. It looks to slow aeons of cryptic metazoan history, which led to a final breakthrough in the Cambrian, not in evolution but of fossilization potential. Yet both views have serious difficulties. Now, in a recent issue of Biological Reviews , Graham Budd and Sören Jensen(1) argue for a third way. In an intriguing blend of functional morphology, the fossil record and cladistic thinking, they suggest that the assembly of metazoan bodyplans took place in a surprisingly straightforward manner. BioEssays 22:1053–1056, 2000. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.