Premium
Art instruction and the Goodenough‐Harris drawing test in fifth‐graders
Author(s) -
Burns Carolyn J.,
Velicer Wayne F.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
psychology in the schools
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1520-6807
pISSN - 0033-3085
DOI - 10.1002/1520-6807(197701)14:1<109::aid-pits2310140122>3.0.co;2-f
Subject(s) - psychology , test (biology) , absenteeism , mathematics education , social psychology , paleontology , biology
The experiment was conducted to assess the effect of ordinary school art instruction in human figure drawing on scores of the Goodenough‐Harris Drawing Test. Subjects consisted of 44 fifth‐grade students attending a suburban parochial school who were members of two preexisting, randomly assigned homeroom classes. Both classes were taught two lessons in art by their regular teachers. The treatment group was taught human figure drawing, and the control group had art lessons excluding figure drawing instruction. The Drawing Test was administered three times, one preinstruction and two postinstruction administrations. Absenteeism reduced treatment and control groups to 14 and 17 subjects, respectively. As predicted, no differences were found in the control group between pretest and postests. The treatment group showed significant gains on both posttests, as well as a significant decline from the first posttest to the second posttest.