z-logo
Premium
Tabula rasa–its origins and implications
Author(s) -
Petryszak Nicholas G.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
journal of the history of the behavioral sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.216
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1520-6696
pISSN - 0022-5061
DOI - 10.1002/1520-6696(198101)17:1<15::aid-jhbs2300170104>3.0.co;2-3
Subject(s) - epistemology , doctrine , philosophy , key (lock) , sociology , ecology , theology , biology
This paper argues that John Locke formulated the concept of tabula rasa to resolve the conflict between the belief in divine determination and the liberal belief in individual freedom. It is pointed out that Locke's concepts of tabula rasa does not deny the existence of biologically innate aspects of nature. In addition, it is found that a number of current theories dealing with theory formation are inadequate for explaining the origins of such key concepts as tabula rasa. As a consequence, an alternative theory of concept formation is proposed. Finally, it is argued that the tabula rasa doctrine cannot be considered as the original impetus to the development of the theory of the social determination of behavior.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here