A paradigm for culturally based care in ethnic minority populations

Health care practitioners are encouraged to “know the cultures” of the multicultural client population they are serving in the United States. The premise behind this injunction is that the use of culturally sensitive techniques that are tailored to the cultural background of the client would result in effective therapy and produce positive outcomes. However, as reflected in the plethora of terms used to describe the application of this knowledge, it is not made explicit why culture would make a difference in therapy nor how it makes a difference, ultimately, in the outcome. The intent of this paper is to highlight one of the fundamental sources of variation in cultural beliefs that affect individual mental health. We propose a model that penetrates to the core of why culture makes a difference in how problems are perceived and appropriate responses defined. Humans have three basic needs: safety and security, integrity, and a sense of belonging. Yet each culture uniquely frames each of these needs and prescribes the sanctioned means to achieve them. In our struggle to define culturally competent or culturally based care, this fundamental aspect is often overlooked. Instead, the Western worldview, structure, and definitions are used as the template to assess dysfunction, diagnose a disorder, and prescribe appropriate care. The theoretical underpinnings of indigenous concepts of self and symbolic interactionism are integrated to clarify these cultural misconceptions and to construct a new paradigm for providing effective and acceptable mental health care.