Open AccessA cross‐sectional study of infection control measures against COVID‐19 and psychological distress among Japanese workers
Author(s) -
Yasuda Yoshino,
Ishimaru Tomohiro,
Nagata Masako,
Tateishi Seiichiro,
Eguchi Hisashi,
Tsuji Mayumi,
Ogami Akira,
Matsuda Shinya,
Fujino Yoshihisa
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of occupational health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1348-9585
DOI - 10.1002/1348-9585.12259
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , cross sectional study , confidence interval , infection control , psychological distress , mental health , distress , covid-19 , odds , logistic regression , residence , environmental health , demography , psychiatry , clinical psychology , disease , surgery , pathology , sociology , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Objectives This study examined the relationship between the status of infection control efforts against COVID‐19 in the workplace and workers' mental health using a large‐scale Internet‐based study. Methods This cross‐sectional study was based on an Internet monitoring survey conducted during the third wave of the COVID‐19 epidemic in Japan. Of the 33 302 people who participated in the survey, 27 036 were included in the analyses. Participants answered whether or not each of 10 different infection control measures was in place at their workplace (eg, wearing masks at all times during working hours). A Kessler 6 (K6) score of ≥13 was defined as mild psychological distress. The odds ratios (ORs) of psychological distress associated with infection control measures at the workplace were estimated using a multilevel logistic model nested in the prefectures of residence. Results The OR of subjects working at facilities with 4 or 5 infection control measures for psychological distress was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05‐1.34, P = .010), that in facilities with 2 or 3 infection control measures was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.25‐1.64, P < .001), and that in facilities with 1 or no infection control measures was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.63‐2.14, P < .001) compared to subjects whose workplaces had ≥6 infection control measures. Conclusion Our findings suggest that proactive COVID‐19 infection control measures can influence the mental health of workers.