Premium
Comparison between GPR and four electromagnetic methods for stone features characterization: An example
Author(s) -
Camerlynck Christian,
Dabas Michel,
Panissod Cedric
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
archaeological prospection
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.785
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1099-0763
pISSN - 1075-2196
DOI - 10.1002/1099-0763(199411)1:1<5::aid-arp6140010103>3.0.co;2-o
Subject(s) - ground penetrating radar , geology , prospection , remote sensing , archaeology , computer science , geography , radar , telecommunications
Multimethod prospection at shallow depth emphasizes capabilities of detection through the different sensitivity of each method. A comparison between four ‘integrative’ methods (electrical/ electromagnetic) and one ‘quasi‐punctual’ method (GPR) is performed to analyse individual efficiency with various physical or geometrical parameters. The chosen site is located at ‘Le Gué Goujard’ (Nièvre), known to exhibit shallow archeological features at depths rather equivalent to limestone geological settings. The different methods involved allow to distinction between them.