z-logo
Premium
Hermite collocation solution of partial differential equations via preconditioned Krylov methods
Author(s) -
Brill Stephen H.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
numerical methods for partial differential equations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.901
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1098-2426
pISSN - 0749-159X
DOI - 10.1002/1098-2426(200103)17:2<120::aid-num3>3.0.co;2-p
Subject(s) - generalized minimal residual method , preconditioner , mathematics , krylov subspace , hermite polynomials , partial differential equation , collocation method , context (archaeology) , discretization , linear system , mathematical analysis , differential equation , ordinary differential equation , paleontology , biology
We are concerned with the numerical solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) in two spatial dimensions discretized via Hermite collocation. To efficiently solve the resulting systems of linear algebraic equations, we choose a Krylov subspace method. We implement two such methods: Bi‐CGSTAB [1] and GMRES [2]. In addition, we utilize two different preconditioners: one based on the Gauss–Seidel method with a block red‐black ordering (RBGS); the other based upon a block incomplete LU factorization (ILU). Our results suggest that, at least in the context of Hermite collocation, the RBGS preconditioner is superior to the ILU preconditioner and that the Bi‐CGSTAB method is superior to GMRES. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 17:120–136, 2001

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here