Premium
Defensive reactions of “wild‐type” and “Domesticated” wild rats to approach and contact by a threat stimulus
Author(s) -
Blanchard D. Caroline,
Popova Nina K.,
Plyusnina Irina Z.,
Velichko Irina L.,
Campbell Desiree,
Blanchard Robert J.,
Nikulina Julia,
Nikulina Ella M.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
aggressive behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.223
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1098-2337
pISSN - 0096-140X
DOI - 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:5<387::aid-ab2480200506>3.0.co;2-d
Subject(s) - stimulus (psychology) , domestication , stimulation , psychology , aggression , aversive stimulus , communication , neuroscience , audiology , developmental psychology , biology , genetics , cognitive psychology , medicine
Selective breeding of wild rats over many generations on the basis of low or high defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact has produced highly polarized “domesticated” and “wild‐type” animals. Because the selection procedure selectively involves these two defense patterns, and these clearly differ in the two groups, it is of interest to determine if other, nonselected, defensive behaviors to threat stimuli also change. “Domesticated” and “wild‐type” rats of the thirty‐fifth generation were run in a fear defense test battery (F/DTB) to systematically evaluate defensive behaviors to a variety of present threat stimuli. “Domesticated” rats showed reduced avoidance and slower flight speed to an approaching experimenter, reduced jump/startle response to handelap and dorsal contact, less vocalization and boxing to vibrissae stimulation or to an anesthetized conspecific, and reduced defensiveness to an attempted pickup by the experimenter. These results indicate that selective bi‐directional breeding for defensive threat and attack to human approach and contact produces group differences in a variety of defensive behaviors, and in defensiveness to stimuli other than those on which the selection was based. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.