Premium
Emotional indicators in human figure drawings of sexually victimized and nonabused children
Author(s) -
Hibbard Roberta Ann,
Hartman Georgia L.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4679(199003)46:2<211::aid-jclp2270460215>3.0.co;2-c
Subject(s) - psychology , sexual abuse , anxiety , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , human factors and ergonomics , poison control , psychiatry , medicine , environmental health
A study was conducted to compare the presence of Koppitz' Emotional Indicators (EIs) and EI Categories in human figures drawn (HFDs) by alleged sexual abuse victims (ASAVs) and nonabused children. We collected drawings from 65 ASAVs and 64 comparison (presumably nonabused) subjects. No statistically significant differences in the presence of individual EIs were observed. Alleged sexual abuse victims tended to draw some indicators more often: “legs pressed together,” “big hands,” and “genitals.” It also was observed that more “normal” children than expected drew some indicators, which suggests the possible need for revision of the definition of some indicators, specifically “omission of body.” The ASAVs more often scored an EI from the anxiety category ( p =.05) than did comparison children. No significant differences in other categories were demonstrated. It was concluded that drawings from ASAVs demonstrated anxiety more often than did drawings from comparison children, while specific indicators did not differ between groups.