Premium
The validity of multidimensional self‐report anger and hostility measures
Author(s) -
Riley William T.,
Treiber Frank A.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4679(198905)45:3<397::aid-jclp2270450308>3.0.co;2-4
Subject(s) - hostility , anger , psychology , discriminant validity , clinical psychology , neuroticism , convergent validity , test validity , psychometrics , social psychology , personality , internal consistency
The present study assessed the convergent and discriminant validity of multidimensional measures of anger and hostility and validated abbreviated neurotic and reactive hostility subscales of the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory. A sample of 120 adults were administered the abbreviated Buss Durkee Reaction (RH) and Neurotic Hostility (NH) subscales, State‐Trait Anger Scale (ST), Anger Self‐Report General (ASRG) subscale, Multidimensional Anger Inventory (MAI), and Framingham Anger‐in (FI), Anger‐out (FO), and Discuss (FD) scales. An intercorrelation matrix supported the convergent and discriminant validity of these measures except for the Angerin/Brood subscale of the MAI and the FO scale. Factor analysis of the scales resulted in three factors: anger experience/hostility, verbal/adaptive anger expression, and maladaptive/physical anger expression. Implications for future research on anger assessment, specifically the components of anger experience and anger expression or suppression, were discussed.