Premium
The measurement of depression: Enhancing the predictive validity of the beck depression inventory
Author(s) -
Burkhart Barry R.,
Rogers Kelly,
McDonald William D.,
McGrath Robert,
Arnoscht Otto
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1368::aid-jclp2270400616>3.0.co;2-1
Subject(s) - beck depression inventory , psychology , depression (economics) , validation test , rating scale , predictive validity , psychometrics , test validity , clinical psychology , psychiatry , developmental psychology , anxiety , economics , macroeconomics
Investigated whether the predictive validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) could be enhanced by having S s complete the BDI under regular vs. a 6‐week projected response set. Six hundred students participated in the initial screening phase, in which they were administered the BDI under both standard and projected instructional sets. Two groups were indentified: High initial‐high projected ( N = 17) and high initial‐low projected ( N = 20). Additionally, a low initial‐low projected control group ( N = 13) was selected. At 5 to 6 weeks follow‐up, these S s again completed the BDI and were administered the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression as a criterion check. Except for the low‐low group, which changed little at follow‐up, the final BDIs were lower than initial BDIs. However, projected BDIs provided for more accurate classification than the initial screening BDI. Also, projected BDI scores were significant predictors of both final BDIs and the Hamilton ratings, whereas initial BDIs did not correlate significantly with either criterion. These data suggest that projected BDI protocols could serve as a practical alternative to more costly or time‐consuming methods of selection of research populations.