Premium
Prediction and explanation of child abuse
Author(s) -
Milner Joel S.,
Wimberley Aonald C.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<875::aid-jclp2270360407>3.0.co;2-1
Subject(s) - psychology , child abuse , human factors and ergonomics , suicide prevention , injury prevention , poison control , clinical psychology , developmental psychology , psychiatry , medical emergency , medicine
Administered the Child Abuse Potential Inventory to 65 abusing and 65 matched nonabusing parents. An item analysis indicated that 77 of the 160 Inventory items Significantly discriminated between abusers and nonabusers. A discriminant analysis which employed the 77 significant items, correctly classified 125, or 96%, af the 130 S s as abusers or nonabuser. Identical results were obtained from a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Principal axis factoring with oblique promax rotations yielded a seven‐factor solution with relatively specific dimensions. The seven factors, or dimensions, were: Distress, rigidity, child with problem, problem from family and others, unhappiness, loneliness, and negative concept of child and of self. Further analysis revealed that the rigidity, unhappiness, and distress factors were the most meaningful dimensions in the understanding of why some people abuse children.