Premium
Chapman's versus Broen and Storms' theory of schizophrenic thought disorder: An empirical comparison
Author(s) -
Paulman Ronald,
MeyersAbell Judith
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
journal of clinical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.124
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1097-4679
pISSN - 0021-9762
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<844::aid-jclp2270360402>3.0.co;2-m
Subject(s) - psychology , arousal , vocabulary , audiology , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , social psychology , medicine , linguistics , philosophy
Compared Chapman's “response‐bias” theory and Broen and Storms' “response‐disorganization” theory of schizophrenic psychological deficit in a combined experimental format. Twenty‐six hospitalized schizophrenics and 26 normal S s, equivalent in age, education, and WAIS vocabulary, were administered a modification of Roberts and Schuhams' (1974) vocabulary sorting task. S s chose a word conceptually similar to a referent from correct, moderate‐ or strong‐distracter, and irrelevant responses. Half of the participants performed under induced muscular tension (squeezing a hand dynamometer). Results indicated that, congruent with Broen and Storms' theory, heightened arousal increased frequency of nondominant, strong‐ distracter errors in normals, but did not affect moderate distracter selection. No significant arousal effects emerged in the schizophrenics. The patient group essentially performed according to Chapman's theory, making significantly more strong‐ than moderate‐distracter errors under both conditions. Rank orders of normal and schizophrenic errors did not differ significantly. Implications are discussed.