Premium
Molecular parameters and their relation to the adhesive performance of acrylic pressure‐sensitive adhesives
Author(s) -
Tobing Singa D.,
Klein Andrew
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/1097-4628(20010321)79:12<2230::aid-app1030>3.0.co;2-2
Subject(s) - acrylic acid , adhesive , acrylate , emulsion , polymer chemistry , materials science , butyl acrylate , solvent , emulsion polymerization , acrylic resin , ethyl acrylate , chemical engineering , copolymer , composite material , polymer , chemistry , organic chemistry , engineering , coating , layer (electronics)
Model acrylic pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs) based on poly(2‐ethyl‐hexyl acrylate‐stat‐acrylic acid) and poly( n ‐butyl acrylate‐stat‐acrylic acid) at 97.5/2.5 wt % were synthesized using semicontinuous emulsion and solution polymerizations. Microgels formed in the lattices retained their discrete network morphology in the film. In contrast, acrylic solution was essentially gel free and crosslinking in the film was provided by the reaction of acrylic acid and post added Al Acetyl Acetonate after solvent evaporation, which led to continuous network morphology. The difference in film network morphology caused significantly lower shear holding power for the film from emulsion PSA compared with that of solvent‐borne film. Unlike shear holding power, loop tack and peel of acrylic PSAs were mainly controlled by the same sol/gel molecular parameters, regardless of emulsion or solution PSAs. The important molecular parameters are sol‐to‐gel ratio, entanglement molecular weight, weight average molecular weight, and to a lesser extent, glass transition temperature. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2230–2244, 2001