Premium
Preoperative imaging to predict orbital invasion by tumor
Author(s) -
Eisen Marc D.,
Yousem David M.,
Loevner Laurie A.,
Thaler Erica R.,
Bilker Warren B.,
Goldberg Andrew N.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0347(200008)22:5<456::aid-hed3>3.0.co;2-n
Subject(s) - orbit (dynamics) , medicine , extraocular muscles , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , surgical planning , surgery , engineering , aerospace engineering
Background Our purpose was to examine the accuracy of preoperative imaging in assessing tumor invasion of the orbit and nasolacrimal system. Methods Nineteen preoperative CT and 17 preoperative MR images from patients at risk for orbital invasion were retrospectively reviewed. Invasion was corroborated by pathologic and intraoperative assessment. Results Tumor adjacent to the periorbita was the most sensitive predictor of orbital invasion (90%) for both CT and MRI. Extraocular muscle involvement on MRI (100%) and orbital fat obliteration (80% MRI, 86% CT) had the highest positive predictive values of the criteria evaluated. Extraocular muscle displacement and enhancement were less accurate (<65%) predictors. No one criterion was >79% accurate in predicting orbital invasion. Six or more positive criteria predicted invasion with 67% sensitivity and 80% specificity (accuracy, 72%). CT was more accurate than MRI in seven of nine criteria. Invasion of the nasolacrimal system was predicted accurately (89%). Conclusions Although preoperative imaging can aid in surgical planning, it should not replace intraoperative assessment in ambiguous cases of orbital invasion. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 22: 456‐462, 2000.