Premium
On the utility and limitations of fine‐needle aspiration of palpable lesions located in the hand
Author(s) -
GarcíaSolano José,
GarcíaRojo Blas,
SánchezSánchez Carlos,
MontalbánRomero Socorro,
MartínezParra Diego,
PérezGuillermo Miguel
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0339(200010)23:4<284::aid-dc14>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - medicine , fine needle aspiration , radiology , cytology , cytopathology , fine needle aspiration cytology , clinical diagnosis , biopsy , pathology , clinical psychology
Various types of superficial and deep‐seated lesions may occur in the hand, causing concern to the patient and posing diagnostic dilemmas to the clinician. A study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) or scraping for the diagnosis of palpable lesions located in the hand. From a clinico‐cytologic point of view, lesions were classified as superficial (n = 41) or deep‐seated (n = 66), and aspirates were categorized into five groups: benign without specific cytohistologic diagnosis, benign with specific cytohistologic diagnosis, atypical, malignant without specific cytohistologic diagnosis, and malignant with specific cytohistologic diagnosis. Out of 107 cases with aspirates adequate for cytologic evaluation, 85 had histologic correlation; in 22 cases, histologic confirmation was deemed unnecessary because of unequivocal cytologic findings and/or clinical workup. Sensitivity was 90.9%, specificity 100%, and efficacy 98%. Based on these findings, we believe that FNA or scraping may help in the clinical workup of patients with either superficial or deep‐seated lesions located in this anatomic region. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2000;23:284–291. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.