Premium
A Phase I dose escalation of combination chemotherapy with granulocyte‐macrophage–colony stimulating factor in patients with neuroblastoma
Author(s) -
Fernandez M. Carmen,
Krailo Mark D.,
Gerbing Robert R.,
Matthay Katherine K.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2838::aid-cncr25>3.0.co;2-9
Subject(s) - medicine , ifosfamide , etoposide , regimen , chemotherapy , toxicity , neuroblastoma , granulocyte colony stimulating factor , gastroenterology , combination chemotherapy , cyclophosphamide , surgery , urology , biology , genetics , cell culture
BACKGROUND Dose intensity is important in the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced neuroblastoma. The aim of the current study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of a combination chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with recurrent neuroblastoma and peripheral neuroepithelioma (primitive neuroectodermal tumor [PNET]) and whether the use of growth factor would allow increased dose intensity. METHODS Twenty‐nine patients diagnosed with recurrent neuroblastoma or PNET were treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, 160 mg/m 2 /96 hours; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m 2 /96 hours; and escalated doses of etoposide and ifosfamide. Granulocyte‐macrophage–colony stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) was administered beginning 24 hours after the completion of the chemotherapy. Courses were repeated at 28‐day intervals. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined the interval between courses was shortened by administering the next course as soon as the patient's neutrophil and platelet counts had recovered to > 1500/μL and > 75,000/μL, respectively. RESULTS Sixteen patients were treated at 3 dose levels. The MTD was defined as 10 g/m 2 /96 hours of ifosfamide and 800 mg/m 2 /96 hours of etoposide. Thirteen additional patients then were treated at 1 level below the MTD to try and decrease the interval between courses. A total of 12 of 29 patients developed a dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) after the first course of therapy. The most common DLT was gastrointestinal toxicity followed by hematologic toxicity. Twenty‐seven patients developed standard National Cancer Institute criteria Grade 3 or 4 toxicity after the first course of treatment and 7 patients achieved a complete or partial response to the first course. The use of GM‐CSF did not allow further dose intensification. CONCLUSIONS This chemotherapy combination achieved a 31% overall response rate. A further increase in the dose intensity of this regimen may require supportive measures other than GM‐CSF to decrease toxicity. Cancer 2000;88:2838–44. © 2000 American Cancer Society.