z-logo
Premium
Etoposide, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin in Extensive Small Cell Lung Cancer
Author(s) -
Loehrer Patrick J.,
Rynard Susan,
Ansari Rafat,
Songer Joseph,
Pennington Kenneth,
Einhorn Lawrence
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0142(19920201)69:3<669::aid-cncr2820690312>3.0.co;2-v
Subject(s) - medicine , etoposide , ifosfamide , regimen , surgery , chemotherapy , cisplatin , lung cancer , chemotherapy regimen , urology , gastroenterology
From December 1987 through April 1989, 40 patients with extensive‐stage small cell carcinoma of the lung were enrolled in a Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) trial using etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP). Patients with extensive disease were eligible if they had not received prior chemotherapy, had a Karnofsky performance status of 50 or more, and had adequate renal function (creatinine, < 1.5 mg/dl) and bone marrow reserve (granulocyte count, ≥ 2500/μl; platelets, ≥ 125,000/μl). Doses of therapy were: etoposide 75 mg/m 2 /day on days 1 to 5, ifosfamide 1.2 g/m 2 /day on days 1 to 5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m 2 /day on days 1 to 5. The first 11 patients received a 5‐day course; this was repeated every 21 days for four cycles, but therapy was shortened to 4 days when unacceptable toxicity was noticed in these patients. Overall, 14 (37%) had a complete remission (overall response rate, 71.1%) with a median survival of 42 weeks (28 weeks on 5‐day regimen and 45 weeks on 4‐day regimen). There were five early deaths. Although toxic, VIP produces a high complete remission rate in patients with extensive disease and warrants further evaluation. A prospective randomized trial comparing cisplatin and etoposide to the VIP regimen is underway through HOG.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here