z-logo
Premium
Long‐term comparison of results of a drug sensitivity assay in vitro with patient response in lymphatic neoplasms
Author(s) -
Bird Martin C.,
Bosanquet Andrew G.,
Forskitt Susan,
Gilby Edward D.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0142(19880315)61:6<1104::aid-cncr2820610609>3.0.co;2-6
Subject(s) - teniposide , medicine , mitoxantrone , etoposide , chronic lymphocytic leukemia , chemosensitivity assay , drug resistance , chemotherapy , drug , in vivo , lymphoma , pathology , in vitro , leukemia , oncology , pharmacology , immunology , biology , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology
Abstract A short‐term differential staining cytotoxicity (DiSC) assay was used to assess the sensitivity of tumor cells in vitro from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma to various cytotoxic drugs. The results have been correlated with drug sensitivities of the tumors in vivo. The chemosensitivity in vitro of eight patients with CLL was observed for 12 to 42 months. In 44 cases the assay correctly predicted seven sensitive and 30 resistant tumors (84% positive correlations). There were six false predictions of sensitivity and one false prediction of resistance. Repeated testing of patients receiving treatment revealed significant and progressive development of drug resistance, while serial tests on untreated patients with CLL gave unaltered results. The development of cross‐resistance to structurally related drugs was observed after treatment and many samples showed a high level of cross‐resistance. However, teniposide showed greater activity than etoposide, and mitoxantrone showed greater activity than the anthracyclines. The high level of agreement between laboratory and clinical results suggests that the DiSC assay may have a useful place (1) in guiding the clinician in the selection of drugs for chemotherapy and (2) in giving an added indication of prognosis for an individual with a lymphatic neoplasm.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here