Premium
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of soft tissue in childhood
Author(s) -
Beverly R. Raney,
Allen Amy,
O'Neill James,
Handler Steven D.,
Uri Antonia,
Littman Philip
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/1097-0142(19860601)57:11<2198::aid-cncr2820571120>3.0.co;2-x
Subject(s) - medicine , soft tissue , pathology
Seven children aged 6 months to 11 years with malignant fibrous histiocytoma, a type of sarcoma of soft tissues, have been treated at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from January 1975 through July 1983. The primary tumor arose in the head and neck region in three patients, the chest wall in two patients and the pelvis or buttock in one patient each. Operative management consisted of complete tumor removal in the two patients with chest wall tumors, and biopsy only in the remaining five children. Afterward, all seven patients were treated with a multiple‐agent chemotherapy program consisting of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide for two years, with or without Adriamycin (doxorubicin). The five patients with residual tumor also received radiation therapy (RT) in doses of 1500 to 5500 rad. The two children with localized, completely excised sarcoma are continuously free of tumor at 1.4 and 9 years after initiation of treatment. Of the five with residual sarcoma, three had a complete response to radiation and chemotherapy, and two of them are free of recurrence at 4 and 5 years, respectively. In the three remaining children, the tumor spread regionally into the central nervous system or distantly into the lungs, subcutaneous tissues, and liver. Childhood malignant fibrous histiocytoma of soft tissue appears to be similar to childhood rhabdomyosarcoma in its modes of spread and response to management. Operative removal is the key to successful therapy. The roles of multiple‐agent chemotherapy and RT remain to be defined. Adriamycin appears to be the most promising single agent. In the absence of concrete data, it seems prudent to follow the same guidelines for irradiation as those used for other soft tissue sarcomas of childhood.