Premium
Futures hedging when the structure of the underlying asset changes: The case of the BIFFEX contract
Author(s) -
Kavussanos Manolis G.,
Nomikos Nikos K.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of futures markets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.88
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1096-9934
pISSN - 0270-7314
DOI - 10.1002/1096-9934(200009)20:8<775::aid-fut4>3.0.co;2-4
Subject(s) - futures contract , index (typography) , hedge , economics , restructuring , econometrics , bivariate analysis , financial economics , order (exchange) , asset (computer security) , variance (accounting) , autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , finance , volatility (finance) , mathematics , statistics , computer science , ecology , computer security , world wide web , biology , accounting
Abstract This article is concerned with the hedging effectiveness of futures contracts whose underlying asset is an index, when the structure of this index is changing. The case of the freight futures (BIFFEX) contract is examined here. Investigation of this issue is particularly interesting as the composition of its underlying asset, the Baltic Freight Index (BFI), has been revised on a number of occasions in order to improve the hedging performance of the market; previous empirical evidence on the market indicates substantially lower variance reduction (4–19%), compared to other markets (up to 98%). The BFI is a weighted average dry‐cargo freight rate index, compiled from actual freight rates on 11 shipping routes that are dissimilar in terms of vessel sizes and transported commodities. The hedging effectiveness of the market is investigated using both constant and time‐varying hedge ratios, estimated through bivariate error correction GARCH models. Our results indicate that the effectiveness of the BIFFEX contract as a centre for risk management has strengthened over the recent years as a result of the more homogeneous composition of the index. This by itself indicates that the latest restructuring of the index, in November 1999, which is aimed at increasing its homogeneity even further, is likely to have a beneficial impact on the market. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 20:775–801, 2000