Premium
The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification
Author(s) -
Cangiarella Joan,
Gross Joshua,
Symmans W. Fraser,
Waisman Jerry,
Petersen Bert,
D'Angelo Dennis,
Singer Cory,
Axelrod Deborah
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/1096-9098(200008)74:4<263::aid-jso4>3.0.co;2-1
Subject(s) - mammotome , medicine , microcalcification , biopsy , lumpectomy , radiology , surgery , incidence (geometry) , breast biopsy , mammography , carcinoma , mastectomy , breast cancer , cancer , pathology , physics , optics
Background and Objectives The ability to achieve clean margins with breast conserving therapy varies greatly even when the diagnosis of carcinoma is known beforehand. Although several reports reveal that the incidence of positive margins decreases after stereotaxic core biopsy of nonpalpable lesions and fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of palpable lesions, the data on the results following mammotome biopsy (mmbx) is scanty. Methods Two hundred and ninety‐eight biopsy specimens for mammographically indeterminate microcalcification from 1/97 through 3/30/98 were reviewed. Biopsies were performed using the biopsys method utilizing an 11‐gauge multidirectional, vacuum‐directed device. Results Ten percent ( n = 31) of the mammotome biopsies were atypical and 9% ( n = 27) were malignant. These 58 cases (19%) were recommended for surgical excision. The incidence of positive margins in this subset was determined. Of patients who underwent lumpectomy as their initial surgical procedure 69% had negative surgical margins. Seventy‐seven percent of patients with carcinoma diagnosed by mammotome biopsy had definitive initial surgery with a single surgical procedure. Conclusions Mmbx facilitates fewer surgical procedures to achieve negative margins, and thus provides a better cosmetic result. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000:74:263–266. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.