z-logo
Premium
Long‐term treatment with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis: Is there an actual efficacy in prevention of rectal cancer?
Author(s) -
Tonelli Francesco,
Valanzano Rosa,
Messerini Luca,
Ficari Ferdinando
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/1096-9098(200005)74:1<15::aid-jso4>3.0.co;2-z
Subject(s) - medicine , sulindac , familial adenomatous polyposis , rectal polyp , dysplasia , colorectal cancer , polypectomy , adenomatous polyps , gastroenterology , anastomosis , rectum , colonoscopy , surgery , cancer , nonsteroidal
Background and Objectives Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is still used in the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Sulindac appears to induce regression of colorectal adenomas; however, its effects in long‐term therapy and in preventing carcinoma remain unclear. Methods Fifteen FAP patients treated by IRA received sulindac (200 mg/day) for a mean period of 48.6 ± 28.7 (range 12–124) months. Number, size, and type of rectal polyps were assessed by endoscopic and histological evaluation every 6 months. Results Significant regression of polyps was observed in all patients after 6 months ( P < 0.02). However, after a mean of 48.6 ± 28.7 months, both number and size of polyps increased again, showing no statistical difference with baseline values. Minute polyps appeared reddish, while the largest lesions were flat or slightly elevated. Endoscopic polypectomy was necessary in 9 patients and transanal surgical excision in 3. Two patients were submitted to restorative proctectomy because of a large polyp with severe dysplasia and a rectal cancer, respectively. Conclusions Sulindac appears to influence the morphological appearence of polyps in FAP patients, inducing apparent regression. However, at a dose of 200 mg, it does not influence the progression of polyps toward a malignant pattern. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000;74:15–20. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here