Premium
Recognizing hominoid‐modified bones: The taphonomy of colobus bones partially digested by free‐ranging chimpanzees in the Kibale Forest, Uganda
Author(s) -
Tappen Martha,
Wrangham Richard
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/1096-8644(200010)113:2<217::aid-ajpa6>3.0.co;2-g
Subject(s) - taphonomy , carnivore , biology , hominidae , ancestor , predation , primate , hyena , zoology , range (aeronautics) , fossil record , ecology , geography , archaeology , biological evolution , genetics , materials science , composite material
We present a taphonomic study of bones that have passed though the digestive tracts of free‐ranging chimpanzees from the Kibale Forest in Uganda. The bone assemblage can be characterized as having a very low species diversity; low number of identifiable specimens (NISP) per scat; bones extremely broken up (very small size range); skeletal part frequencies similar in some ways to those resulting from carnivore partial digestion; and sometimes articulated specimens. Modifications to the bones include corrosion, tiny tooth scores and pits, cracking, and fraying of bone edges. Together, these characteristics suggest that hominoid bone digestion may be recognizable, despite some similarities with leopard‐, canid‐, and eagle‐modified bone. Chimpanzees are well‐documented hunters of medium‐sized vertebrates such as monkeys. This is significant in the study of human evolution if, as it seems, the last common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans was chimpanzee‐like. It suggests there was a pre–stone‐tool‐using hunting phase in human evolution, perhaps by australopiths or the last common ancestor. Taphonomically, pre–stone tool meat eating has been very difficult to detect in the fossil record. However, if chimpanzees leave a recognizable taphonomic signature on the bones of their prey, we will be able to look for analogous signatures in fossil bones associated with fossil hominoids and hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 113:217–234, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.