Premium
A comparison of three commercially available isoelectric focusing units for proteome analysis: The Multiphor, the IPGphor and the Protean IEF cell
Author(s) -
Choe Leila H.,
Lee Kelvin H.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000301)21:5<993::aid-elps993>3.0.co;2-9
Subject(s) - reproducibility , isoelectric focusing , spots , chromatography , proteome , immobilized ph gradient , silver stain , chemistry , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , enzyme
We tested and compared three different commercially available instruments for isoelectric focusing for proteome analysis by two‐dimensional protein electrophoresis. These instruments, the Multiphor, the IPGphor, and the Protean IEF cell, were used with 18 cm immobilized pH gradient strips and run under various conditions. The total number of spots and features was obtained by Melanie software (Bio‐Rad Laboratories) and separately by visual inspection. The Multiphor consistently resulted in the highest number of spots detected per gel independent of sample type, immobilized pH gradient (IPG) and method to calculate the number of spots. The Protean IEF cell had the next highest number of spots detected per gel. In the experiments performed, the IPGphor afforded good reproducibility in the total number of Melanie‐detected spots from gel to gel while the Protean IEF cell offered better reproducibility in the total number of manually detected spots from gel to gel. Among gels run with the different instruments, differences in the quality of the ammoniacal silver stain were also observed. A measure of quantitative reproducibility suggests that the Protean IEF cell, which was the easiest instrument to use, performs better than the other instruments, although all three instruments had demonstrated good quantitative reproducibility in the experiments performed.