Premium
Induction of anti‐tumor immunity by intrasplenic administration of a carcinoembryonic antigen DNA vaccine
Author(s) -
White Stephen A.,
LoBuglio Albert F.,
Arani Ramin B.,
Pike Mary J.,
Moore Susan E.,
Barlow Daunte L.,
Conry Robert M.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the journal of gene medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.689
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1521-2254
pISSN - 1099-498X
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1521-2254(200003/04)2:2<135::aid-jgm88>3.0.co;2-o
Subject(s) - carcinoembryonic antigen , immune system , antibody , humoral immunity , dna vaccination , immunology , immunity , medicine , antigen , virology , immunization , cancer
Background We have previously reported that intramuscular, intradermal or epidermal gene gun administration of a plasmid encoding carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) under transcriptional regulatory control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) early promoter/enhancer elicits CEA‐specific humoral and cellular immune responses in mice with resultant immunoprotection against challenge with syngeneic, CEA‐expressing colon adenocarcinoma cells. Methods In the present work, we examine the ability of this DNA vaccine construct (pCEA) to elicit CEA‐specific immunity following intrasplenic administration. Groups of mice were immunized with pCEA by intrasplenic or intramuscular injection. Six weeks later, mice were evaluated for the presence of anti‐CEA humoral responses and were challenged with syngeneic, CEA‐expressing colon carcinoma cells. Results Intrasplenic administration of pCEA produced a frequency of CEA‐specific antibody responses comparable to that elicited by intramuscular pCEA inoculation. Both intrasplenic and intramuscular administration of pCEA generated IgG2a antibody responses to CEA, consistent with the induction of T helper‐1‐biased immune responses. In addition, partial immunoprotection against tumor challenge was observed after a single plasmid DNA dose by either route of administration. Subsequent studies revealed that antibody responses to intrasplenic DNA vaccination are dose and schedule dependent. Conclusion These findings support future investigations of DNA vaccination strategies that specifically promote the uptake of plasmid by splenocytes. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.