Premium
Pelviureteral inhibitory reflex and ureteropelvic excitatory reflex: Role of the two reflexes in regulation of urine flow from the renal pelvis to the ureter
Author(s) -
Shafik Ahmed
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
neurourology and urodynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1520-6777
pISSN - 0733-2467
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1997)16:4<315::aid-nau7>3.0.co;2-h
Subject(s) - renal pelvis , medicine , ureter , distension , reflex , urology , urinary system , balloon , anatomy , anesthesia
The mechanism by which the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) regulates the passage of urine from the renal pelvis to the ureter, and prevents urinary backflow from the ureter to the renal pelvis, is not completely understood. The current communication studies this mechanism in 18 dogs. With the dogs under anesthesia, nephrostomy was done through which two catheters (one pressure and one balloon‐tipped) were introduced into the UPJ and the renal pelvis, respectively. Renal pelvis distension with a balloon filled with 1 ml of saline effected a rise of renal pelvic pressure from a mean basal pressure of 4.8 ± 1.2 cm H 2 O to 6.9 ± 2.3 cm H 2 O ( P < 0.05). The basal UPJ pressure of 12.6 ± 2.7 cm H 2 O showed no significant change with 1 ml distention of the renal pelvic balloon ( P > 0.05). Renal pelvic distension with 2, 3, and 4 ml caused a significant rise of renal pelvic pressure to 8.4 ± 2.7 ( P < 0.05), 10.6 ± 2.2 ( P < 0.01), and 11.8 ± 1.9 ( P < 0.01) cm H 2 O, respectively, and a significant drop of UPJ pressure to 4.8 ± 1.2, 4.7 ± 1.1, and 4.6 ± 1.2 cm H 2 O ( P < 0.01), respectively. Ureteric distension with a balloon filled with 0.5 ml of saline significantly raised the ureteric pressure from a mean basal value of 4.3 ± 1.4 cm H 2 O to 14.7 ± 3.3 cm H 2 O ( P < 0.01) and the UPJ pressure to a mean of 20.8 ± 3.8 ( P < 0.05). Ureteric distension with 1 and 1.5 ml of saline led to an elevation of ureteric and UPJ pressure which was not significantly different from that observed with distension with 0.5 ml ( P > 0.05). In contrast, the UPJ showed no significant pressure change upon distension of the locally anesthetized renal pelvis or ureter, respectively. Likewise, the locally anesthetized UPJ exhibited no significant pressure response to renal pelvic or ureteric distension. The study demonstrates that urine might have to accumulate in the renal pelvis up to a certain volume and pressure so as to effect UPJ opening, which occurs at its maximum irrespective of the distending volume. UPJ opening upon renal pelvic distension postulates a reflex relationship which we call “pelviureteral inhibitory reflex.” This reflex is believed to regulate the passage of urine from the renal pelvis to the ureter. Ureteric distension closes the UPJ we call this reflex action the “ureteropelvic excitatory reflex” as it seems to prevent reflux of urine through the UPJ and thus protects the kidney. The concept that the UPJ acts as a physiologic sphincter is put forward. Neurourol. Urodynam. 16:315–325, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.