z-logo
Premium
Fluoxetine and sertraline dosages in major depression
Author(s) -
Cantrell Rowin,
Gillespie William,
Altshuler Lori
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
depression and anxiety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.634
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1520-6394
pISSN - 1091-4269
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1999)9:2<78::aid-da6>3.0.co;2-7
Subject(s) - fluoxetine , dose , sertraline , depression (economics) , psychiatry , psychology , medicine , antidepressant , pharmacology , serotonin , anxiety , receptor , macroeconomics , economics
In a retrospective study, we sought to determine medication dosages usually prescribed to obtain euthymia in 59 outpatients with a diagnosis of major depression treated with fluoxetine or sertraline. Charts of veterans admitted to the outpatient mental health clinic at the West Los Angeles Veterans Hospital with a diagnosis of major depression and treated with either fluoxetine or sertraline were reviewed. Progress notes were analyzed for a 6‐month time period after the initiation of the medication treatment, and improvement was rated by a physician blind to the drug used for treatment. No significant differences were found in overall response rates between the fluoxetine (81% responders) and sertraline (76% responders) groups. Eighty‐one percent of the fluoxetine responders compared to 32% of sertraline responders were at the manufacturer's recommended starting dose (MRSD) at the time of clinical response. One‐third of patients receiving sertraline were started on or rapidly titrated to more than 50 mg/day. When only those patients receiving an adequate trial of sertraline at 50 mg were considered, 47% required a dose increase to achieve a remission. These data suggest that 50 mg of sertraline may be inadequate for some patients to achieve a resolution of symptoms of major depression and that many clinicians currently prescribe in a manner suggesting that they believe the MRSD is a suboptimal dosage. Depression and Anxiety 9:78–82, 1999. Published 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. This article is a US Government work, and, as such, is in the public domain of the United States of America.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here