z-logo
Premium
Sensitivity and specificity of the body mass index to assess low percent body fat in African women
Author(s) -
Gartner Agnes,
Maire Bernard,
Traissac Pierre,
Massamba JeanPierre,
Kameli Yves,
Keraudren Vincent,
Delpeuch Francis
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
american journal of human biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.559
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1520-6300
pISSN - 1042-0533
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(200001/02)12:1<25::aid-ajhb4>3.0.co;2-9
Subject(s) - bioelectrical impedance analysis , cutoff , body mass index , quartile , medicine , receiver operating characteristic , population , lean body mass , demography , zoology , confidence interval , body weight , biology , physics , environmental health , quantum mechanics , sociology
The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the body mass index (BMI, kg/m 2 ) to reflect low percent body fat (%BF) in a population with a rather mild but widespread prevalence of low BMI. A sample of 586 women was studied in the Plateau Koukouya, a rural area of the Republic of Congo, Central Africa. Percent BF was estimated from bioelectrical impedance (BIA). BIA parameters were assumed to reflect lean body mass. The correlation between %BF and BMI was high (r = 0.84; P < 0.001). Low %BF or low BIA parameters were defined as the first quartile of the distribution. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of BMI <18.5, an accepted international cutoff for thinness, in relation to %BF was 58.5%, 93.6%, 75.4%, and 87.1%, respectively. A continuous sensitivity/specificity analysis (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves) for characterizing low %BF or low BIA parameters was done for a large range of BMI values. ROC curve analysis for %BF suggested that an acceptable trade‐off between sensitivity (89.8%) and specificity (77.9%) occurred at a BMI of 19.7 kg/m 2 . However, the positive predictive value was low (57.6%). For the prediction of low BIA parameters, results were similar, showing moderate sensitivity and high specificity for BMI <18.5, a cutoff point of BMI = 19.6, and low positive predictive values (<48%). The data suggest that BMI was not a good predictor of low %BF. This is consistent with the assumption of a decrease in both fat and fat free body mass in cases of low BMI. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 12:25–31, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here