Premium
The development of English Primary Care Group governance. A scenario analysis
Author(s) -
Sheaff R.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the international journal of health planning and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1099-1751
pISSN - 0749-6753
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-1751(199910/12)14:4<257::aid-hpm558>3.0.co;2-b
Subject(s) - corporate governance , primary care , government (linguistics) , legislation , business , public administration , accounting , public relations , political science , medicine , finance , law , philosophy , family medicine , linguistics
At present there is a policy vacuum about what English Primary Care Groups' (PCGs) governance will be when they develop into Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Draft legislation leaves many options open, so PCT governance is likely to ‘emerge’ as PCTs are created. It also remains uncertain how general practitioners (GPs) will react to the formation of PCTs and how the UK government will then respond in turn. A scenario analysis suggests three possible lines of development. The base (likeliest) scenario predicts a mainly networked form of PCT governance. An alternative scenario is of PCT governance resembling the former National Health Service internal market. A third scenario predicts ‘franchise model’ PCTs employing some GPs and subcontracting others. To different degrees all three scenarios predict that PCTs will retain elements of networked governance. If it fails to make GPs as accountable to NHS management as the UK government wishes, networked governance may prove only a transitional stage before English PCTs adopt either quasi‐market or hierarchical governance. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.