Premium
The decentralization of health care in developing countries: organizational options
Author(s) -
SMITH B. C.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
public administration and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1099-162X
pISSN - 0271-2075
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-162x(199710)17:4<399::aid-pad976>3.0.co;2-p
Subject(s) - decentralization , jurisdiction , institution , public administration , agency (philosophy) , organizational structure , population , government (linguistics) , administration (probate law) , enumerated powers , health care , public institution , field (mathematics) , political science , economics , sociology , economic growth , politics , law , separation of powers , social science , linguistics , philosophy , demography , mathematics , pure mathematics
The complex ways in which decentralization is practised in the field of government health services are examined. Organizationally, decentralization means a choice between different types of public institution, which vary in terms of: the areas over which they have jurisdiction, the functions delegated to local institutions; and the way decision‐makers are recruited, so producing institutions . There is little agreement about the optimum size of areas, either in terms of population or territory. Areas cannot be delimited without consideration being given to the powers to be exercised at each level. The specification of functions always assumes certain things about who will exercise the delegated powers. The two issues cannot be separated. Five structures of decentralization are distinguished, each of which could in principle be created at regional, district and village/community level: the multi‐purpose local authority, the single‐purpose council, the hybrid council, the single purpose executive agency, the management board, field administration, health teams, and interdepartmental committees. Whatever the institutions used for decentralization, the choice of structures and the ensuing process of decision‐making will be highly charged politically. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.