z-logo
Premium
Is the incidence of upper respiratory tract infection independent of drug treatment in large cohort studies of longer term use drugs?
Author(s) -
Wilton Lynda V.,
Freemantle Shayne N.,
Martin Richard,
Mann Ronald D.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.023
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1099-1557
pISSN - 1053-8569
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199808)7:1+<s4::aid-pds352>3.0.co;2-v
Subject(s) - medicine , drug , incidence (geometry) , pharmacoepidemiology , cohort , respiratory tract infections , cohort study , respiratory tract , intensive care medicine , respiratory system , pharmacology , medical prescription , physics , optics
In observational cohort studies which monitor drug safety, the patterns of reported events are likely to be influenced by a number of factors. We hypothesized that the distribution of events which are unlikely to be adverse events associated with drug use, differ from that for events which may be adverse drug reactions. In 39 individual Prescription‐Event Monitoring (PEM) studies, the incidence rates for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and back pain, in the first month of treatment and in the subsequent 5 months, were compared to those for nausea/vomiting and malaise/lassitude. For URTI and back pain there was no statistically significant difference in the event rates between these time periods. This pattern may be characteristic of events which are independent of the disease being treated and are unlikely to be adverse events associated with drug use. However, for nausea/vomiting and malaise/lassitude, which can be adverse events associated with drug treatments, the event rates in the first month of treatment were significantly greater than in subsequent months. These observations confirm that doctors are reporting events irrespective of whether or not they suspect the event to be an adverse event associated with the drug. This provides a simple validation of the PEM methodology. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here