z-logo
Premium
In Vivo 31 P NMR Spectroscopy of Human Musculoskeletal Tumors as a Measure of Response to Chemotherapy
Author(s) -
Möller Harald E.,
Vermathen Peter,
Rummeny Ernst,
Wörtler Klaus,
Wuisman Paulus,
Rössner Albert,
Wörmann Bernard,
Ritter Jörg,
Peters Peter E.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
nmr in biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.278
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1099-1492
pISSN - 0952-3480
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199612)9:8<347::aid-nbm431>3.0.co;2-3
Subject(s) - chemotherapy , pi , intracellular , in vivo , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , chemistry , inorganic phosphate , phosphate , necrosis , medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , nuclear medicine , biology , biochemistry , stereochemistry , physics , microbiology and biotechnology
The value of in vivo 31 P NMR spectroscopy to provide indicators of response to cytostatic chemotherapy was studied in patients with malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Characteristics of untreated cancers were strong signals of PME and PDE, moderately increased P i and low PCr. The intracellular pH was slightly alkaline. The intracellular concentration of free magnesium was 70% of that in muscle. Spectroscopic findings at different times of therapy were compared with the percentage of tumor necrosis after surgical resection in 28 patients. In follow‐up studies, energy‐rich phosphates declined in nonresponders, while PME, P i and frequently PDE increased. Treatment response appeared to involve the reversal of these trends. In five responders, a biphasic pattern was observed, i.e. initially the spectrum changed into that of severely ischemic cell injury followed by a successive phase of apparent "tumor activation'. Pretreatment levels of (PCr+P i )/total phosphate ≥0.35 and PCr/α‐NTP ≥1.5, an accelerated increase in total low‐energy phosphates/total high‐energy phosphates (≥3.0%/day) after the initial drug application, and a long‐term decrease (≤−0.4%/day) during later therapy were highly indicative of tumor response to chemotherapy. Such spectroscopic predictors for treatment response proved to be superior to currently used indices such as tumor size.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here