z-logo
Premium
Deforestation and land‐use effects on soil degradation and rehabilitation in western Nigeria. I. Soil physical and hydrological properties
Author(s) -
Lal R.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
land degradation and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1099-145X
pISSN - 1085-3278
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-145x(199603)7:1<19::aid-ldr212>3.0.co;2-m
Subject(s) - agronomy , leucaena leucocephala , tillage , environmental science , plough , mucuna , agroforestry , no till farming , forestry , soil fertility , geography , soil water , biology , soil science
Assessments of the effects of deforestation, post‐clearance tillage methods and farming systems treatments on soil properties were made from 1978 through 1987 on agricultural watersheds near Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria. These experiments were conducted in two phases: Phase I from 1978 through 1981 and Phase II from 1983 to 1987, with 1 year (1982) as a transition phase when all plots were sown with mucuna ( Mucuna utilis ). There were six treatments in Phase I involving combinations of land clearing and tillage methods: (1) manual clearing with no‐till (MC‐NT); (2) manual clearing with plough‐till (MC‐PT); (3) shear‐blade clearing with no‐till (SB‐NT); (4) tree‐pusher/root rake clearing with no‐till (TP‐NT); (5) tree‐pusher/root‐rake clearing with plough‐till (TP‐PT); (6) traditional farming (TF). The six treatments were replicated twice in a completely randomized design. The traditional treatment of Phase I was discontinued during Phase II. The five farming systems studied during Phase II with a no‐till system in all treatments were: (1) alley cropping with Leucaena leucocephala established on the contour at 4‐m intervals; (2) and (3) fallowing with Mucuna utilis on severely degraded and moderately degraded watersheds, respectively, for 1 year followed by maize‐cowpea rotation for another; (4) and (5) ley farming involving establishment of pasture in the first year on severely and moderately degraded plots, respectively, controlled grazing in the second year, and growing maize ( Zea mays )‐cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) in the third year. All treatments, imposed on watersheds of 2–4 ha each, were replicated twice. The soil properties analyzed were particle size distribution, total aggregation and mean weight diameter of aggregates, soil bulk density, penetrometer resistance, water retention characteristics, infiltration capacity and saturated hydraulic conductivity. These properties were measured under the forest cover in 1978, and once every year during the dry season thereafter during Phases I and II. Prior to deforestation, mean soil bulk density was 0·72 Mg m −3 and 1·30 Mg m −3 , soil penetration resistance was 32·4 KPa and 90·7 KPa, and mean weight diameter of aggregates was 3·7 mm and 3·2 mm for 0–5 cm and 5–10 cm depths, respectively. The infiltration rate was excessive (54–334 cm hr −1 ) and saturated hydraulic conductivity was rapid (166–499 cm hr −1 ) under the forest cover. Furthermore, water transmission properties varied significantly even over short distances of about 1 m. Deforestation and cultivation increased soil bulk density and penetration resistance but decreased mean weight diameter of aggregates. One year after deforestation in 1980, mean soil bulk density was 1·41 Mg m −3 for 0–5 cm depth and 1·58 Mg m −3 for 5–10 cm depth. Soil bulk density and penetration resistance were generally higher for NT than for PT methods, and the penetration resistance was extremely high in all treatments by 1985. During Phase II, soil bulk density was high during the grazing cycle of the ley farming treatment. Sand content at 0–5 cm depth increased and clay content decreased with cultivation duration. Soon after deforestation, saturated hydraulic conductivity and equilibrium infiltration rate in cleared and cultivated land declined to only 20–30 per cent of that under forest. Mean saturated hydraulic conductivity following deforestation was 46·0 cm hr −1 for 0–5 cm depth and 53·7 cm hr −1 for 5–10 cm depth. Further, infiltration rate declined with deforestation and cultivation duration in all cropping systems treatments. During Phase I, mean infiltration rate was 115·8 cm hr −1 under forest cover in 1978, 20·9 cm hr −1 in 1979, 17·4 cm hr −1 in 1980 and 20·9 cm hr −1 in 1981. During Phase II, mean infiltration rate was 8·5 cm hr −1 in 1982, 11·9 cm hr −1 in 1983, 11·0 cm hr −1 in 1984, 11·3 cm hr −1 in 1985 and 5·3 cm hr −1 in 1986. Infiltration rate was generally high in ley farming and mucuna fallowing treatments. Natural fallowing drastically improved the infiltration rate from 19·2 cm hr −1 in 1982 to 193·2 cm hr −1 in 1986, a ten‐fold increase within 5 years of fallowing. High‐energy soil water retention characteristics in Phase I were affected by those treatments that caused soil compaction by mechanized clearing and no‐till systems. Soil water retention at 0·01 MPa potential in 1979 was 19·2 per cent (gravimetrics) for SB, 17·9 per cent for TP, 15·9 per cent for MC and 17·8 per cent for TF methods. With regards to tillage, soil water retention was 17·8 per cent for NT compared with 16·8 per cent for PT. During Phase II, water retention characteristics were not affected by the farming system treatments. Mean soil water retention (average of 4 years' data from 1982 to 1986) at 0·01 MPa for 0–5 cm depth was 16·6 per cent for alley cropping, 16·7 per cent for mucuna fallowing and 16·8 per cent for ley farming. Mean soil water retention for 1·5 MPa suction was 9·3 per cent for alley cropping, 8·7 per cent for mucuna fallowing, and 9·3 per cent for ley farming. Water retention at 1·5 MPa suction correlated with the clay and soil organic carbon content.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here