Premium
Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract
Author(s) -
McLean Parks Judi,
Kidder Deborah L.,
Gallagher Daniel G.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of organizational behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.938
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1099-1379
pISSN - 0894-3796
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(1998)19:1+<697::aid-job974>3.0.co;2-i
Subject(s) - square (algebra) , work (physics) , psychological contract , domain (mathematical analysis) , psychology , social psychology , mathematical economics , economics , mathematics , mathematical analysis , geometry , physics , thermodynamics
In this paper, we have endeavored to integrate the literature on psychological contracts with the literature on contingent work arrangements. We have further developed the theoretical foundation of the psychological contract and its dimensions. After reviewing previous work on contingent employment, we illustrate how the dimensions of psychological contracts (stability, scope, tangibility, focus, time frame, particularism, multiple agency and volition) highlight the differences and similarities among alternative employment arrangements in a meaningful and parsimonious manner. In doing so, we have sought to offer an alternative to the categorization of employment arrangements that has, thus far, made comparisons across studies difficult. In addition, we argue that the dimensions of psychological contracts, more so than the content of these contracts, are more generalizable across various types of work arrangements, as well as across different types of jobs and across national boundaries. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.